'Raised eyebrows' Prince Andrew 'planned' Balmoral trip not effort to dodge court – expert

    [ad_1]

    During a discussion on ITV’s Royal Rota podcast about Prince Andrew’s presence at Balmoral Castle as lawyers for Virginia Giuffre, who accuses the Prince of battery by sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress, attempt to serve court papers to him, ITV Royal Producer Lizzie Robinson claimed the trip to Scotland was in fact “planned” and not part of an effort to escape the courts. The Duke of York has vehemently denied all the allegations put forward by Ms Giuffre.

    Speaking to the show, Ms Robinson said: “He is back at Balmoral, he went to Balmoral where The Queen is spending her summer holiday as usual.

    “He went there in August, spent some time there, came back to Windsor where he lives at Royal Lodge and he has just returned back to Balmoral”.

    But she stressed: “We are told that visit was planned, he had planned to spend two parts of the summer there.”

    But the producer suggested how the timing of the Prince’s trip to Scotland has however “raised some eyebrows” given how the Prince made a similar trip to Balmoral when he was originally sued by Ms Giuffre.

    JUST IN Meghan Markle following Royal Family precedent with Sussex title use to launch Archewell

    She added how further questions have been raised how this second visit to Balmoral comes just ahead of the court hearing on Monday 13. Despite speculation, there is no suggestion the Prince has intentionally visited Balmoral following the progression of the case.

    Her comments come as documents filed to the US district court for the southern district of New York on Friday, lawyers for Virginia Giuffre state there was a first attempt to serve the papers on the duke on August 26, when an agent went to Windsor Great Park but was turned away by a Metropolitan Police officer serving as head of security.

    The officer reportedly told the agent how officers were not able to accept service of any court process, or let anyone trying to serve legal papers onto the property.

    The agent returned the next day and was told the court process could be left with the police officer at the main gate “and that this matter would then be forwarded on to the legal team”.

    READ MORE Prince Andrew sought to exploit Charles’ unpopularity to become regent, expert claims

    The document says the complaint, the summons, and other papers were enclosed “in a plastic sleeve and then in an A4 envelope, addressed to the said defendant, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, at the address” and then left with the police officer.

    It says within 21 days of the summons the plaintiff must be served an answer to the complaint, and “if you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint”.

    Andrew has stepped back from public duties amid the fallout from his relationship with Epstein.

    Lawyers for Ms Giuffre filed the civil suit citing allegations of battery by sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress against the Duke.

    DON’T MISS
    Prince Harry to host major event with Jill Biden TODAY [LATEST]
    ‘Bad look reputationally’ Chris Ship on Andrew [INSIGHT]
    Prince Charles ‘may not take the throne’ but pass role to William [ANALYSIS]

    Buckingham Palace previously released a statement to say: “The Duke of York unequivocally regrets his ill-judged association with Jeffrey Epstein.

    “Epstein’s suicide left many unanswered questions, particularly for his victims. The Duke deeply sympathises with those affected who want some form of closure.

    “It is his hope that, in time, they will be able to rebuild their lives. The Duke is willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations if required.

    “The Duke has already stated that he did not see, witness, or suspect any behaviour of the sort that subsequently led to Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest and conviction. He deplores the exploitation of any human being and would not condone, participate in, or encourage any such behaviour.”



    [ad_2]

    Previous articleHigh cholesterol: Hardening of arteries can lead to unusual sensations in the arms or legs
    Next articleCould BOTOX protect people from getting Covid?

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here